Y Combinator LogoAnnouncing Enjamb's backing by Y Combinator to build the agentic workspace for drug programs.
Use cases

Regulatory

Draft and audit submission work from the evidence already in your workspace.

Enjamb helps teams draft, cross-check, and improve INDs, protocols, SAPs, NDAs, briefing books, and response materials with every important claim tied back to its supporting evidence.

IND
protocol, SAP, NDA, and briefing workflows
Claim
level source support
Audit
trails across drafting and review
Regulatory submission drafting and audit

Workspace prompt

Draft and audit a regulatory section using the approved protocol, SAP, evidence tables, and analysis outputs.

Agent response

Enjamb drafts from existing workspace context, checks claims against sources, and produces an audit trail for review.

01
Assemble the submission context
02
Draft from governed sources
03
Cross-check every claim
04
Prepare the review package

Execution runbook

What happens after the prompt

Enjamb turns an open-ended program request into a reviewable chain of evidence, analysis, drafting, and audit.

01

Assemble the submission context

Agents collect approved evidence, protocols, SAPs, analysis outputs, tables, figures, and prior reviewer comments.

02

Draft from governed sources

The drafting agent writes submission sections, briefing materials, or responses using the source-backed workspace context.

03

Cross-check every claim

Audit agents compare statements, numbers, references, and terminology across documents and supporting files.

04

Prepare the review package

Outputs include the draft, evidence support, unresolved questions, consistency notes, and suggested reviewer focus areas.

Use case workflow

The work inside the workspace

Request a demo

Drafting

Start from program context, not a blank document.

Because evidence, analyses, protocols, and prior artifacts live in the same workspace, agents can draft from the work already reviewed by the team.

  • Draft regulatory sections, briefing books, and response materials
  • Convert analysis outputs into reviewer-ready narratives
  • Use templates and standards for consistent structure

Audit

Find unsupported claims before reviewers do.

Agents can compare statements against source papers, data outputs, tables, and prior documents to identify gaps, inconsistencies, and review risks.

  • Trace claims back to evidence and source files
  • Check consistency across documents, tables, and figures
  • Surface missing support, mismatched numbers, and stale rationale

Agent team

Specialized agents, one program context

Regulatory drafter

Writes submission sections and response materials from approved context.

Evidence auditor

Checks claims against papers, tables, source files, and prior documents.

Consistency agent

Finds terminology, number, reference, and cross-document conflicts.

Review agent

Packages open questions and reviewer notes for cross-functional signoff.

Artifacts produced

  • Submission section draft
  • Claim support table
  • Consistency audit
  • Reviewer question log

Review safeguards

  • Claim-to-source traceability
  • Cross-document consistency
  • Reference validation
  • Human approval gates

Outcomes

What teams get back

The goal is not more documents. It is a faster, more traceable way to move program work into review.

Shorter submission drafting cycles

Cleaner cross-document consistency

More defensible reviewer-facing packages