Evidence synthesis

Turn scattered clinical evidence into decisions your team can defend.

Enjamb agents search, extract, compare, and cite the evidence behind patient populations, endpoints, biomarkers, safety signals, and competitive precedent.

Live

clinical evidence retrieval

Cited

tables, summaries, and claims

Traceable

source-backed reasoning

Request a demo Explore all Platform

Workspace prompt

Compare endpoint precedent, safety signals, and patient populations for a new indication strategy.

Agent response

Enjamb creates cited evidence tables, summarizes precedent, flags gaps, and carries the rationale into trial and regulatory work.

Scope the evidence question

Retrieve and extract

Normalize the findings

Write the rationale

Execution runbook

What happens after the prompt

Enjamb turns an open-ended program request into a reviewable chain of evidence, analysis, drafting, and audit.

Scope the evidence question

Agents identify the drug, disease, competitors, endpoints, biomarkers, comparators, and confidence threshold.

Retrieve and extract

The engine searches full-text literature, trial registries, labels, conference material, and internal files for relevant evidence.

Normalize the findings

Endpoints, populations, effect sizes, adverse events, and study constraints are structured into comparable evidence tables.

Write the rationale

Agents draft decision-ready summaries with source links, uncertainty notes, and reviewer questions.

Platform capability

The work inside the workspace

Request a demo

Coverage

Evidence across the program landscape.

Agents can map what is known, what is uncertain, and what precedent exists across publications, trial registries, regulatory materials, labels, and internal documents.

Compare trial designs, endpoints, and inclusion criteria
Extract efficacy, safety, biomarker, and population signals
Generate evidence tables with source-level traceability

Decisions

Evidence synthesis becomes program strategy.

The output is not another pile of summaries. It is structured rationale that can move into trial design, regulatory briefing, diligence, and internal decision memos.

Pinpoint gaps before they become protocol amendments
Surface precedent for endpoint and comparator choices
Tie every claim back to source material for review

Agent team

Specialized agents, one program context

Retrieval agent

Finds the most relevant source material across external and internal evidence.

Extraction agent

Pulls endpoints, population criteria, outcomes, and safety findings into tables.

Synthesis agent

Explains what the evidence supports, contradicts, or leaves unresolved.

Citation agent

Keeps claims tied back to source documents and quoted evidence.

Artifacts produced

Clinical evidence table
Endpoint precedent summary
Safety signal brief
Source-backed rationale memo

Review safeguards

Full-text source links
Contradiction flags
Recency checks
Claim-to-citation traceability

Outcomes

What teams get back

The goal is not more documents. It is a faster, more traceable way to move program work into review.

Faster asset and indication diligence

Sharper endpoint and population strategy

Source-backed evidence packages for cross-functional review